The Short Report


Wednesday, March 12, 2008

A National Primary

After witnessing firsthand the media circus that was the New Hampshire primary, I no longer have any doubt in my mind of two things: the absolute need for a single, national primary, and that my generation is the furthest thing from apathetic.
I also no longer have any doubt that a seven-hour drive can drive a person to clinical insanity.
After returning home and regaining my mind, I watched the news coverage of all I had witnessed firsthand and saw, perhaps, the most horrifying aspect of politics: spin!
Left and right, (pun intended) the news networks were declaring winners of debates and "frontrunners" of elections without any substance backing it up. During one Republican forum in particular, just prior to the New Hampshire primary, Fox News had a group of 30 “undecided voters” watch the debate and then decide for whom they would vote. Any guesses on the vote tally? 28 Romney to 2 McCain. At least pretend to be fair or balanced!
So as primary after primary passed by, I noticed that the media spun every vote and debate into winners and losers, no matter how close the numbers or vague the differences on issues. Why? Because conflict is exciting! And if that conflict occurs between more than two opposing parties, the general public gets confused, and confusion means lower ratings. Remember John Edwards?
To put it simply, the earlier a state has its primary, the more power its voters have in the primary season. Iowa and New Hampshire, specifically, have a history of destroying political campaigns in one fell swoop. And in recent years, the other 48 are vying for the maximum amount of influence.
The later your primary, the less your vote counts. For example, in moving the California primary to an earlier date in the political season, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger cited his reason being that it would make the race more “fair” because Californians were now more influential in choosing the candidates.
That idea sounds about as popular as "Jingle All the Way," Arnold.
I am proud to live in Pennsylvania, a state that has the pride to avoid the political games of pushing primary dates around in an attempt to gain unfair influence. But in doing so, our primary will be nothing more than an approval vote of nominees who will already have been decided. What a joke! And then when my generation becomes sick of these political games being played in Washington, our politicians act surprised, and even upset, to hear such a thing!
We want change, and I am not talking about the pretty, one-line sound clip that has lost all meaning during the last few weeks on the presidential caravan. My generation wants a national primary where every vote is counted at once, and every vote is as influential as every other vote.
Radical idea, huh?
Not at all. An election with candidates that zigzag across the country, rely on donations from low class families to stay in five-star hotels, and depend on media popularity and sound clips to become the next leader of the free world sounds like the radical thought to us.
My generation is not apathetic at all. We are just tired of the current situation and administration. We are tired of being lied to. We are looking for a candidate that, for a change, we can trust.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

The Youth Vote

I cannot tell you how many times I have been told that my interest in politics is a waste of time. From parents to peers to professors, they all said the same thing: the government is what it is, and there is no way to change it, especially at your age!
As a politically motivated middle-school student, (and let me tell you, it was a rare breed) I could not figure out what to do for the ever-telling school Career Day. It was my understanding that my entire professional future relied on this day.
Naturally, I approached my parents with my dilemma. Both artists, they gave me wise advice: “Whatever you do, if you want to make money, don’t be an artist.”
Even at my young age, that was common sense. Knowing I enjoyed politics, with the deadline approaching, I contacted my local congressman via his online suggestion box with a plea to visit him for Career Day. To my surprise, his office responded and they said I was permitted to follow Congressman Greenwood all day.
I couldn’t believe it!
For some reason, my middle school friends were not as ecstatic as I was.
I remember two things from that day with Congressman Greenwood: his inability to stop calling me Alfred and his informing me of the Congressional Page Program.
Needless to say, I focused more heavily on the latter. Never letting that dream out of my head, I became a Congressional Page in my junior year and still, for some reason, my then high school friends remained unenthusiastic about my political life. As I left high school and entered college, I began to accept that my passion for politics was never going to ever be accepted by my peers, but by no means will that slow me down.
I started writing this column because day after day, I read newspapers without ever seeing the views of my generation represented, and without strikingly important questions ever being asked, let alone answered. Considering the entire purpose of politics is to preserve our nation and its integrity for generations to come, I see it as more than appropriate to hear what the youth have to say.
I recently braved the cold to travel up to New Hampshire to witness the "first in the nation" primary. From rallies to the debates and forums to the streets, I was perplexed at the lack of substance of the political circus going on around me. There were, however, more than enough clowns.
At more than one campaign event I witnessed frantic campaign aides removing empty chairs so that the room would appear more crowded to the cameras.
On more than one street corner, I failed to achieve coherent definitions of health care from scores of supporters representing every side of the aisle.
When I ventured to see a “public debate" I couldn’t help but notice that the audiences were bused in by the respective campaigns, and I could not turn left (or right, to be politically fair) without police questioning where I was going, what I was doing, and why someone my age would be interested in politics.
I do not know about you, but I think our elections ought to be open for discussion, and our candidates ought to be open for questioning! I would like to see a debate during which candidates are allowed to actually speak to each other. I would like to see an election out of the hands of the media!
As an increasingly significant presidential election approaches, I want to see the candidates being asked real questions, and giving real answers. But in the end, that is entirely up to you.

Labels: , , , , ,


CONTACT US  •  OUR PUBLICATIONS  •  PRIVACY POLICY  •  NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION
© 2007 Journal Register Company. All Rights Reserved.