Spencerblog Announcement
I am concerned that the tone of a lot of the comments being made on this site are becoming increasingly personal and nasty.
At times, I have been guilty of running up too close to the line myself. Others have obviously crossed it.
So, let's remember, attack the argument not the person making it. Personal insults don't do anything to advance the discussion. And name-calling is, after all, middle-school stuff.
The Management
UPDATE: That doesn't mean I won't link to sites that promote this type of middle-school stuff. Like this one. But WE'RE better than that!
At times, I have been guilty of running up too close to the line myself. Others have obviously crossed it.
So, let's remember, attack the argument not the person making it. Personal insults don't do anything to advance the discussion. And name-calling is, after all, middle-school stuff.
The Management
UPDATE: That doesn't mean I won't link to sites that promote this type of middle-school stuff. Like this one. But WE'RE better than that!
posted by Spencerblog at
6:58 AM
30 Comments:
I'm in and I'm Sorry.
Ed -
You're a good man.
And I ashamedly admit I got a kick out of your diagnosis of you know who.
Cheers
Gil and Ed-
I'm sure plenty of people got a kick out of my comments on you guys as well.
I heard the staff at the Times gets a chuckle out of my battles with Gil as well.
You’re not nearly as important as your Lib ego seems to think you are.
What? How do you know I was talking about David?
It’s not like I mentioned how he pleasures himself while reading Gene Lyin’s columns.
Rand-A-L
Try executing instruction "exit loop".
BTW, if you are referring to Gene Lyons, I had no idea who you were talking about (I had to look him up, after decoding your clever Lyin's pun).
Clearly, you have confused me with your own behavior regarding Spencer. :-) I think the psychological term is 'projection'. It's pretty creepy that you are fantasizing about me pleasuring myself. Seek treatment.
But if I had been "born gay" it would be perfectly acceptable and wouldn't require treatment?
(Hehehe)
Well, I see everybody's taking my advice.
Gil, who do you admit nearly crossing the line with? Don't you think, before you ask people to go easy on you, that you owe those people an apology?
I know the list would be long, but you're up to the challenge.
Gil-
Just link to an online phone book, it will save time. :-)
Gil doesn’t owe anyone an apology. He just wants the tone of his blog cleaned up. This is a reasonable request and I for one think it is shameful how David has soiled this place with all his dirty talk.
please, Gil asking anyone to moderate his tone and "play nice" is hypocritical.
Let's see him set the example.
Rand-A-L-
If you weren't such a fool, I consider that a very funny bit of sarcasm. However, your tone, language and attitude are on display for all to see.
The problem with Gil moderating is that his bosses don't moderate him, so he hasn't really seen it in action.
There’s that Lib advocating censorship again.
Do you not soil this place with your childish and offensive dirty Libism, Dave?
Hey Dave, why do you post here so much, anyway? Not enough traffic at your own board? Gee, I wonder why? Lol…
And since you’re always posting links to your blog here, I hope you have a standing link to Gil’s blog on your site. It would be the honorable thing to do. ;)
Randal & David - If I have to stop this car ... ;-)
Rand-A-L-
I was going to create a SpencerBirdCageLiner.com domain and point it here. :-)
Actually, I get a lot of traffic at my site, but I don't allow anonymous posting. One of the campaigns was telling me that I'm even drving some traffic to its cite. Thanks for asking.
I see the word "dirty" is getting a lot of hits in your random insult generator.
I think others would agree that your graphic descriptions of gay sex and the orifices they use for their perversions would be considered disgusting, inappropriate or “dirty”.
You’re the only one here who seems to enjoy such talk.
I think that they also would agree that your site is lame.
Rand-A-L-
Anonymous was the one talking about unnatural acts, unusually shaped bagel, and orifice lubrication.
I limited myself to a common guy-on-girl action that is identical to guy-guy option.
I enjoy seeing little prudes like you whine and show they are unable to handle an adult conversation.
No, it was you. And I am no prude; you're just classless. And none to smart, seeing how you embrace Libism.
Here's how you can start practicing what you preach, Gil:
1. read today's Daily News article by Bill Bender (an actual reporter);
2. make a public apology to the taxpayers of Penn Delco School District, Board member Kim Robinson, Board member Tony Ruggieri, and Solicitor Mark Sereni, for your having gone right along with clouding the truth about what really has been going on with the school district;
3. stop relying on polluted sources to create your own "sensationalist stories" and start getting your facts straight.
Rand-A-L-
none to smart?
try
none too smart
Anonymous-
link to Bill Bender's article
Bill Bender is a real reporter and a class act, as opposed to Gil, who is neither. Bill's article is filled with actual investigative results and empty of advocacy.
I thought you were going to forgo the petty nitpicking like a woman, Dave?
Just so you know, your pointing out my forgetting one of these “o” does not in any way negate the fact that you post filth here.
Libs are petty like that. They really seem to think that such distraction somehow saves them in an argument. Like children they are!
Rand-A-L-
You remind me of Larry Craig referring to Clinton a "naughty".
and "like a woman".
So, can we add "sexist" to "bigot" and "racist"?
Dear Concerned Neighbor/Loyal Client/Truth or Consequences (whatever your name is for the time being):
The article in the Times today does not clear Mark Sereni, Kim Robinson and Tony Ruggieri from any wrongdoings. It's merely pointing out other people who's practices were shady too.
Go sell your diversions somewhere else, no one's buying it.
I can't believe that you think my site is middle-school stuff. You're nothing more than a big doo-doo head. :^)
Thanks for the plug.
As Always,
Your Humble Servant
Liberal Hypocrisy
You can sling any of your silly Lib labels my way that you want to, Dave. They are meaningless. It’s not my fault that you are guided by your emotions, much like a female.
What sort of self-respecting man would be a Liberal these days anyway?
And you will find nothing racist in anything I have posted here. It will take more than you dishonestly calling it such to make it true.
Rand-A-L-
In answer to your question: any man with a 3-digit IQ.
Umm.. in your post about the 10,000 Good Men, you wrote Just what that city needs: 10,000 more black men prowling the streets at night.
If you've got a stronger word than "racist" you would prefer me to use, I'd be happy to upgrade.
Umm, there’s nothing “racist” about that. With 99% of the violent crime and murders in that city being perpetrated by blacks males at night, tossing 10,000 more into the mix could reasonably be seen as throwing more fuel on the black fire.
See, you White Guilty-ridden apologist Liberals try to label any white who dares comment on any topic dealing with race a “racist”. And I already told you, your silly labels mean nothing. Because we’re not playing that calculated, conversation-limiting game anymore. Evolve, girlieman.
Randal likes to use "White guilt" as a put down for people against discrimination.
The right-wing racists like to use code-words to spread their philosophy. "White guilt" is their new version of "race traitor". The the old phrase was discredited (hard to believe anyone used it in the first place).
Randal is a Krazy Klueless Konservative.
Still with the silly labels...
Post a Comment
<< Home