RSS
The Right to Fatherless Children
In Britain, women win the "right" to have children without fathers..
What a backward country. In America, millions of woman have children without fathers.
What a backward country. In America, millions of woman have children without fathers.
posted by Spencerblog at
8:24 AM
11 Comments:
Funny what the Left sees as “rights”. Like this “right” to harm an entire society and generation of children… or the “right” for gays to “marry”.
And just why is it that such Libs see men as an unnecessary and expendable part of a family but if someone were to feel the same about women in, say, the workplace, sudden they’re “sexist”.
Libs are funny. Well, not really so much “funny” as despicable, backwards, idiotic, hypocritical, dishonest… Nothing really funny about them.
randall don't be such a tool. i am not for fatherless children but why do you have an issue with gays marrying?
Do you see two father household as good?
Everyone knows and science backs it that kids need BOTH a male and female influence in their raising –a mom AND a dad. Gay marriage and gay adoption ignores this and causes untold harm to children’s development, all for the sake of selfish gay “wants”.
First off I never said anything about mo's having kids, I still struggle with that one, but they should def be allowed to marry. I struggle on the having kids issue for reasons you list, but let me ask you this: Who is better off? The kid w/ mom/dad that are poor/abusive parents or the one with 2 mo's that are supportive and provide stable environment? Many people out there (hetero and non) that shouldn't be parents at all just as there are many hetero and non that would make great parents but cannot have kids for one reason or another.
This post has been removed by the author.
"Mo's"! Lol!
Ho hum, once again Dishonest Dave just says whatever comes to his dishonest finger tip. And when all else fails he calls someone a KKK. Hey, DD, ya gonna call everyone here “Nazis” again too? Lol…
You have just seen the entire depth of the Dishonest Dave Diano dogma, Dingo. Stick around, you’ll see what I mean.
Of course science has said that kids need both a mother and a father. Many times. This is onea them annoying unquestionable and inarguable facts that doesn’t even require a link.
You know this, DD, therefore you are just lying once again.
Many pedophiles are gay. And gays indeed want to teach kids to be gay. They have implemented this recruiting by inserting gay celebration into elementary schools. And all one need do is visit a site which promotes they Gay Agenda and there they will see that part of that agenda is ensuring that they have prey into the future.
"Gay recruiting" and a "Gay Agenda?" Wow, it is hard to imagine anyone who thinks like that.
I truly don't mean to insult you r, but I really am struck by the fact that you believe that there is some gay conspiracy.
I also know better than to argue with you. You clearly are set in your beliefs. Nothing could change your mind.
But, let me ask you, do you dislike gays as a group?
Mandingo!
To brave anon:
I love the fact that people take shots at others anonymously. So liberal of you.
There is a gay agenda! It exists`to indoctrinate our youth, and also to silence ANY opposition.
The agenda wants to eliminate any gender difference and also to "radically" transform the traditional meaning of marriage.
This new gayness has permeated all levels of our society, and the only way to defeat it is to keep stating the truth.
C. Scott Shields, Esquire
www.shieldsandhoppe.com
randal and progun/prochrist/pro dickbag:
you are silly. while i don't doubt that there some gays that may want to teach others to be gay I believe that they are on the fringe. I know and am friends with quite a few bone smugglers and I believe if they had a choice they wouldn't be gay. I've seen too many a turd burglar tortured by their sexuality and coming out to others to know that its not a choice. If it were up to them theyd be hetero, life would be much easier, but they simply cannot help their true love of cock. All kidding aside, these pole smackers should be allowed to marry if they want to. Don't be so worried about them, live and let live.
Good post, Dumb Dingo. Love the un-PCness.
That’s kinda where I am with it. I have nothing against gays personally. I have gay friends too. They can do all the disgusting things in their own bedrooms they want, for all I care. It is the angry and ugly, militant demanding of their wants by gay activists forcing the Gay Agenda on our society that they bully and lie about and try to call “rights” that pizzes me off. There is a great deal of raw hatred in gay agenda activists. Hardly something to support or sympathize with. Clearly things have gone too far when militant gay is the new normal and decent people that oppose such things are put on the defensive and attacked.
Just like blacks… I have nothing against your common black citizen, it’s the bitter militant ones, reverse racists, purveyors of the Racial Double Standard and criminals that are the problem.
Righties like me and Mr. S are all about hating the sin, not the sinner. Or, in my case, hating the Lying Libism and not the Lib. …until the sinning Lib goes all militant. Then we hate them too.
Post a Comment
<< Home