Blogs > Phollowing the Phillies

Insight, observations (and whatever else comes to mind) on the trails of the team that ended the quarter century-long parade drought in the City of Brotherly Love - the Philadelphia Phillies.



Monday, April 27, 2009

Romero sues supplement maker

J.C. Romero knows he won't get his 50 games back.

The Phillies reliever was suspended in early January for negligence, related to violating Major League Baseball's drug policy after unknowingly taking a supplement that included a banned substance.

Although he won't get his time on the field he dearly misses, he's trying to recoup the estimated $1.3 million in salary he loses with the suspension.

Romero filed a lawsuit today in Camden County, N.J. seeking punitive and compensatory damages against the nutritional supplement manufacturer, alleging an unlisted ingredient in one of its products caused him to test positive for a substance banned by Major League Baseball.


"I purchased an over-the-counter supplement that I was told and believed would not cause me to test positive," Romero said in a statement released by his legal team Monday. "These events have hurt me deeply and placed a cloud over my career, accomplishments and family. It is my hope that I can finally start to put this event behind me and protect the interests of others who rely on manufacturers and retailers to be honest about their products."

Romero was with the Phillies this weekend in Florida, working out with the team during batting practice. His suspension won't be lifted until the Phillies play their 50th game, likely sometime in the first week of June.

Romero is spending the first two months of the season working out at the Phillies spring training and minor league facilities in Clearwater, Fla.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Tracey said...

He's got a much better argument against the manufacturer than he had against MLB. MLB made their zero-tolerance policy clear and gave an 800 number, and while I think the punishment was excessive, it was as-advertised.

But how could the manufacturer not list an ingredient or provide a warning about an ingredient that can cause you to fail a drug test in the Olympics or a professional sport? And with the United States Supreme Court's recent opinion in Wyeth v. Levine, opening the door on lawsuits even if the drug label complies with the law, he may ave a very good case.

April 27, 2009 9:12 PM 

Post a Comment

<< Home