Monday, October 8, 2007

Butt ban

Ed, all the more power to Trenton Councilwoman Annette Lartigue for pushing for an ordinance to ban obscene buttocks fashion. It’s nice to see a government official finally take a stand against obscenity, or as they put it, an expression of free speech. It will be nice to try to get this country back on the road to decency.
Pure E. Tan
There’s a continuum of sensibilities. On Polynesian islands, where the human body isn’t considered offensive, parts can hang out all over without causing a fuss. The below-the-butt fashion fad is pretty stupid. And it defies the purpose of pants. And it traces to inmates offering up their orifices. But indecent? Who’s to say?—Ed. Note

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out the headings: Too Much Butt and Kick Em Out and get a real look see at the Councilwomen in the City of Trenton. It's about time, the citizens were made aware of what really goes on in Council Chambers. Lartigue is a fake who could care less about her senior constituents. She seems to feel that the way people wear their pants is a hot button issue. Staton is quite possibly on the way to criminal charges along with her cohorts, Pintella and Segura. Staton is so upset about her accepting $10,000 from disgraced Senator Torricelli she nearly bit Councilman,Coston's head off when he even mentioned voting practices. Pintella who quickly came to her defense, is once again embroiled in yet another scandal involving money. Too late, the New York Times already printed the story and I'm sure the U.S. Attorney's Office already knows about it. Funny how all the small town Mayors and their cronies always end up in handcuffs. See you at the hearing.

October 8, 2007 4:21 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Click on: Safe city, Call it quits, Butthead, 10 safest cities, My butt, Double standard, Too much butt, Mission impossible, Blight spots and Kick em' out.
The truth, is hard to swallow.

October 8, 2007 4:29 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Instead of the mindless bull that you people whine about, you know gangs, big butt ladies, Plamer and the gang that runs Trenton, why not launch a campaign from this location about school tax. My point is simple. Why do people who have no children in a school district or people 60 years of age have to pay school tax? Why can't that tax be eleminated for them or at the very least cut in half. Also, why does the State have to send us our rebate tax? There should be a place to check off sending that money right to our property tax agency if one should choose to do so. Now isn't that better than hearing all the whiners boo haa and cry in their coffee. JR Yardville

October 10, 2007 10:40 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Jr. What's mindless about complaining about gangs and a Mayor who has no time to run the city that has stood behind him for twenty years. Let's weigh this. Money or Gangs. Which would you say is more important. There's no comparison. No matter how much money we save, what good will it do any of us, if we can't step outside to spend it because of the bullets flying around our heads.
Perhaps your should redirect your tears. Taxes are across the board,
we all pay for something that does not pertain to our individual tax dollars. But, when it comes to increasing crime statistics that threatens us all,I think the decision is made.

October 16, 2007 2:39 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey anonymous, your smart as a whip. Why would anyone care more about money than gangs. Yes, money is important but as you said, we can't spend it. We can't or refuse to step out of our homes in the evening. And yet we work all day to make the money that we will eventually be targeted for. That's what the gangs want from us.

October 22, 2007 9:05 PM 

Post a Comment

<< Home